User talk:Dnalor 01

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Dnalor 01!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 11:25, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Rein - Fassade, Bernhard von Clairvaux.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:05, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Ilz 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sputniktilt 21:48, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schulkreuz Akademisches Gymnasium Graz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK, though less noise would be preferable --A.Savin 10:51, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grazer Synagoge - Innenraum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, once the CAs removed (fixable imo). --JLPC 16:21, 31 May 2014 (UTC)  Done : feel free to reverse. --JLPC 13:23, 1 June 2014 (UTC) Thank you very much, no need to reverse! --Dnalor 01 14:57, 1 June 2014 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --P e z i 17:37, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KZ Auschwitz-Birkenau, Bahngleise der Entladerampe, Blumen zum Gedenken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments DOF is always a potential problem in that kind of pictures, but the sharp flowers with ribbon and the unsharp background produce a good composition here. -- MJJR 08:18, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veitsch - Pfarrkirche St. Vitus, Außenansicht 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. But I propose to remove some of the tiny blurry birdspots. --Cccefalon 15:52, 20 June 2014 (UTC)  Done Thank you, removed. --Dnalor 01 17:00, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kodak Retina (Typ 117), 1934.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A dustspot and right side too tight crop. See annotations. --Cccefalon 16:47, 24 June 2014 (UTC)  Done. Thank you for the suggestion! --Dnalor 01 06:50, 25 June 2014 (UTC) Considerably better and QI. --Cccefalon 08:31, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Maria Fischer, Gestapo-Bild, in Privatbesitz des Autors.JPG

File:Maria Fischer, Gestapo-Bild, in Privatbesitz des Autors.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

77.184.50.248 07:42, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

 Keep Acording to de:Lichtbild it becomes PD 50 years after publication or after creation.--Sanandros (talk) 15:43, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

---

Kept: INeverCry 17:31, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seiko Grand Quartz 9940-8010 (Twinquartz), 1979.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- XtoF 18:04, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Swatch Swiss Autoquarz, 1998.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:58, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bulova Ambassador Automatic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can pass as QI IMO. However, for a kind of studio setting, the ISO is much too high. If possible, you schould use a tripod and take the photos with ISO100 and exposure around 1/15 --Cccefalon 12:53, 25 August 2014 (UTC) Okay, thank you very much, for the future: I'll use a tripod and do the things you told me ;-) --Dnalor 01 13:06, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche San Michele de Murato, Korsika - Der Sündenfall (die Schlange reicht Eva die Frucht vom Baum der Erkenntnis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --ArildV 12:28, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puch 250 R, Baujahr 1935, 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 20:03, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seiko King Diashock 25 Jewels, 2. Modell 1967.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 20:35, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puch 250 R, Baujahr 1935, 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:05, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tissot Handaufzug, 1958.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Livioandronico2013 12:10, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Habsburger Mausoleum, Kopf Erzherzog Karls. II am Kenotaph.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:43, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Omega Genève Handaufzug, Cal. 613.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 10:36, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seiko LCD Solar Alarm Chronograph A156-5000, 1978.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:01, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bau-Inschrift Taubenkobel, Graz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 14:35, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Omega Handaufzug, Cal. 267, 1957 58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 19:14, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tissot Twotimer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments qi to me. --Ralf Roletschek 22:58, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Bischofskapelle, Maria-Krönungsaltar, Predella, Wochentagsseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness is not at its best, but considering the object it is ok for QI IMO. --Cccefalon 18:41, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Bischofskapelle, Grabinschrift der Seckauer Bischöfe Martin Brenner und Jakob I. Eberlein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --Cccefalon 18:43, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bucht von Calvi, Blick von Notre-Dame de La Serra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --A.Savin 11:10, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Gnadenkapelle, Gotisches Glasfenster 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 06:15, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Gnadenkapelle, Gotisches Glasfenster 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 06:15, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Gnadenkapelle, Gotisches Glasfenster 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 06:15, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Congratulations and many thanks that you have contributed to WLM with new quality pictures. Kind regards from --Regiomontanus (talk) 19:26, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your friendly congratulations! With best regards --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 07:48, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Habsburger Mausoleum, Kopf Erzherzog Karls. II am Kenotaph, 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good Quality, for me QI --Hubertl 12:36, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Gnadenkapelle, Gotisches Glasfenster 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Habsburger Mausoleum, Kenotaph 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful photo available light. Good nuanced. QI for me. --Steindy 20:49, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VW Karmann-Ghia Cabrio Typ 14 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:59, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VW Karmann-Ghia Typ 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:59, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volkswagen 1300, 1974 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 22:17, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volkswagen 1300, 1974 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:59, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche San Nicolao, San Nicolao, Haute Corse, Korsika.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, great impression! --Hubertl 12:31, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche San Michele de Murato, Korsika - Romanisches Kapitell 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:44, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche San Michele de Murato, Korsika - Romanisches Kapitell 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:27, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche San Michele de Murato, Korsika - Romanische Skulptur.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:20, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corsica Ferries Mega Express Two.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK now, though I would cut a bit of the bottom. --P e z i 10:35, 16 December 2014 (UTC) Thanks for your comment, I've cropped it at the bottom!  Done --Dnalor 01 10:28, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feuerhimmel 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Weak pro --Hubertl 09:43, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feuerhimmel 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feuerhimmel 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Spital am Pyhrn, Innenraum 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:59, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Spital am Pyhrn, Innenraum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:59, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Spital am Pyhrn 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Palauenc05 19:49, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Spital am Pyhrn 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:49, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Spital am Pyhrn 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 12:26, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Spital am Pyhrn 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and good quality. --Steindy 10:29, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Zusätzlich zu dem Mail von heute

habe ich dir eine neue Kategorie eingerichtet. Siehe hier. Das ist eine, die jeder hat, der mit QI, VI und FP arbeitet. Es ist eine sogenannte "verborgene" Kategorie. Bitte bedenke, dass das Eintragen dieser Kategorie nicht automatisch erfolgt, sondern Handarbeit ist, dh. Bilder, die positiv bewertet wurden, musst du selbst dort kategorisieren, sonst tauchen sie in dieser Liste nicht auf. Ist aber eine praktische Übersicht, auch über die Anzahl der Bilder. Bist ja knapp vor 50 inzwischen. --Hubertl (talk) 10:16, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Vielen herzlichen Dank für Deine tolle Hilfe, lieber Hubertl, dass Du das alles für mich bereits gemacht hast, habe ich absolut nicht erwartet! Meine wirklich ehrliche Wertschätzung für Deine Arbeit habe ich Dir gerade vorhin in sternförmiger Weise übermittelt! LG --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 08:59, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red cloud cover 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 00:34, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red cloud cover 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Great moment! --Hubertl 11:49, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Double rainbow, Graz, Austria, 2010-05-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:04, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mond Halo (Lichteffekt), Graz, Österreich, 23. Oktober 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Hubertl 12:47, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche San Michele de Murato - Bandgesims mit Weintrauben, Engel und Winzer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:22, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche San Michele de Murato - Romanisches Fenster 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:15, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche San Michele de Murato - Romanisches Fenster 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:22, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche San Michele de Murato - Romanisches Fenster 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 18:54, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche San Michele de Murato - Außenansicht 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High quality.--ArildV 11:04, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gedenktafel an die Quarantäne-Baracken 16, 17 und 18; Gedenkstätte KZ Mauthausen 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 00:20, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gedenktafel an die Quarantäne-Baracke 19, Gedenkstätte KZ Mauthausen 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 00:20, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche San Michele de Murato, Korsika - Romanischer Bogen mit Figuren.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good work. --Steindy 00:20, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche San Michele de Murato - Außenansicht 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:24, 08 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yellow-legged gull (Larus michahellis) in flight in Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:40, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Filemover

---

Hallo Dnalor 01, du bist jetzt Dateiverschieber! Bitte beachte die folgenden Hinweise, wenn du Dateien verschiebst:

• Bitte benutze den Link zum CommonsDelinker in der {{Rename}}-Vorlage um den Bot zu beauftragen, alle Verwendungen des alten Dateinamens zu ersetzen. Falls es keine solche Anfrage gab, benutze bitte den Tab Verschieben & Ersetzen.
• Bitte nominiere keine Weiterleitungen mit {{Speedy}} zur Schnelllöschung. Andere Projekte, z.B. solche die InstantCommons verwenden, könnten die Datei verwenden obwohl dies nicht bei der Dateiverwendung angezeigt wird. Das Löschen der Weiterleitungen würde deren Dateiverlinkung zerstören.
• Bitte beachte und befolge die Empfehlung zum Verschieben von Dateien.

--Steinsplitter (talk) 16:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche San Michele de Murato - Außenansicht 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done Noise reduction done. Okay now? --Dnalor 01 15:00, 11 January 2015 (UTC) Indeed --Poco a poco 18:43, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rupertikirche Hohenrain - Glasfenster "Hl. Rupert", Ausschnitt (Rudolf Szyszkowitz).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:41, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rupertikirche Hohenrain - Glasfenster "Hl. Rupert" (Rudolf Szyszkowitz).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice, good quality. --Steindy 14:37, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Graz-St. Peter 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Although I do not like this crazy unnatural perspective distortions which are required in QI, very good quality. --Steindy 14:37, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veitsch - Pfarrkirche St. Vitus, Außenansicht 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 10:48, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Objektive Carl Zeiss, Jena, Nr. 145077 und Nr. 145078, Tessar 4,5 F 5,5cm DRP 142294 (Baujahr vor 1910) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:39, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gedenktafel der Israelitischen Kultusgemeinde Wien, Gedenkstätte KZ Mauthausen 2004.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:20, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Objektive Carl Zeiss, Jena, Nr. 145077 und Nr. 145078, Tessar 4,5 F 5,5cm DRP 142294 (Baujahr vor 1910) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The DOF could be greater, but good quality. --Steindy 01:06, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Einfahrtsgebäude zum KZ Mauthausen 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bad weather, but good quality. --Steindy 01:17, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eingangsgebäude mit Haupttor KZ Mauthausen 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bad weather, but good quality. --Steindy 01:17, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gedenktafel zur Todesstiege, Steinbruch Wiener Graben 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 01:17, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Rein - Fassade, Hornwerk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:26, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Rein - Bibliothek.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:26, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Rein - Markgraf Leopold, Stifter von Stift Rein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, fine work! --Steindy 21:21, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rupertikirche Hohenrain - Hl. Rupert.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Spital am Pyhrn 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Distinct quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Rein - Stiftungsurkunde, Faksimile.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support IMO acceptable, the edges are missing. (And the transcription.) --XRay 17:36, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Rein - Bibliothek, Wolfgang-Missale.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--NoRud 16:21, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Rein - Bibliothek 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--NoRud 16:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Rein - Stiftshof mit Basilika.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 21:11, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Einfahrtsgebäude zum KZ Mauthausen 2014 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:05, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Einfahrtsgebäude zum KZ Mauthausen 2014 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 17:07, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eingangsgebäude KZ Mauthausen 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 00:52, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eingangsgebäude mit Haupttor KZ Mauthausen 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:27, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KZ Mauthausen, SS-Mannschaftsgebäude und Garagen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 09:25, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Rein - Bibliothek, Antiphonale Cisterciense, Miniatur Erzengel Michael.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overprocessed, resulting in artefacts. Can perhaps get salvaged. --Cccefalon 17:19, 15 January 2015 (UTC)  Done Thanks for your review! New, corrected version uploaded. Okay now? --Dnalor 01 11:26, 16 January 2015 (UTC) Yes better but not your best one. However, I appreciate the EV and think it can pass as QI IMO --Cccefalon 16:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick vom Stadtturm des Alten Rathauses zum Innsbrucker Dom 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:20, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stacheldraht-Mahnmal, Gedenkstätte KZ Mauthausen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:37, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KZ Mauthausen, Häftlingsbaracken und Lagerstraße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. QI for me --Hubertl 09:46, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gedenktafel der Israelitischen Kultusgemeinde Wien, Gedenkstätte KZ Mauthausen 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 01:27, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goldener Adler (Symbol), Hotel "Goldener Adler", Innsbruck, Tirol, Österreich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:47, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick vom Stadtturm des Alten Rathauses zum Innsbrucker Dom 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 09:44, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick über Kufstein von der Festung aus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 11:48, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festung Kufstein01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--NoRud 10:41, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festung Kufstein02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:51, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gütesiegel "Meistersingerschule".jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:50, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akademisches Gymnasium Graz, Südfront 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting perspective. Good quality. --Steindy 17:41, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akademisches Gymnasium Graz, Frontansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:58, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akademisches Gymnasium Graz, Gesamtansicht 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:35, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Habsburger Mausoleum, Kenotaph.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Difficult to photograph. Yet remarkably good quality. --Steindy 17:38, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Chorkapelle, Gnadenstuhl (Martin Matousch, 1908) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--NoRud 11:32, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Chorkapelle, Gnadenstuhl (Martin Matousch, 1908) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:12, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Bischofskapelle, Maria-Krönungsaltar, Predella, Anna selbdritt (1507).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 13:30, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akademisches Gymnasium Graz, Gedenktafel für die Opfer des 1. Weltkrieges.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality,a little overexposed middle overhead on the cross.--NoRud 11:27, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Benediktinerabtei Seckau, Äußerer Klosterhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I especially like that the shadow area is well characterized. --Steindy 20:24, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abtei Seckau - Innerer Klosterhof 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 20:24, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abtei Seckau, Innerer Klosterhof, Kreuzgang 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I especially like that the shadow area is well characterized. --Steindy 20:24, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abtei Seckau, Innerer Klosterhof, Kreuzgang 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 15:59, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Benediktinerabtei Seckau, Blick von den Türmen der Basilika auf den Südturm und den Westtrakt des Klosters.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:18, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Vorhalle, Romanischer Löwe.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:18, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Von Schnee und Reif bedeckter Ast eines Nadelbaumes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Die Riegersburg von Süden 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:53, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Die Riegersburg 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:53, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Habsburger Mausoleum, Mantelhelm Erzherzog Karls II. 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:19, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Habsburger Mausoleum, Reiterschwert, Dolch und Sporen Erzherzog Karls II. 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 00:25, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Die Riegersburg 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments special.--Famberhorst 19:03, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Die Riegersburg 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:18, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Habsburger Mausoleum, Funeralwaffen Erzherzog Karls II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 00:44, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Habsburger Mausoleum, Mantelhelm Erzherzog Karls II. 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:16, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prankher-Helm (Replik), Benediktinerabtei Seckau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 00:44, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Außenansicht der Abtei Seckau 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Die Riegersburg von Süden 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pylos mit Sfaktiria.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:58, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ahornblätter (Acer) im Herbst.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:12, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ilz Hauptplatz.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:15, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rom, Sankt Paul vor den Mauern, Vorhalle, Säulenreihe 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 19:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rom, Sankt Paul vor den Mauern, Vorhalle, Säulenreihe 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 19:53, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rom, Sankt Paul vor den Mauern, San Paolo fuori le mura.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:06, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Rein, Gesamtansicht 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 00:49, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Rein, nördliche Fassade 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:27, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rom, Sankt Paul vor den Mauern, Vorhalle, Säulenreihe 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 11:34, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rom, Sankt Paul vor den Mauern, Statue des Heiligen Paulus im Vorhof der Basilika.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:00, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rom, Sankt Paul vor den Mauern, Vorhalle, Säulenreihe 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Tsui 07:59, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche San Nicolao, San Nicolao, Haute Corse, Korsika 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza Hafen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Left side of the images is blurred. See the note. Maybe a crop would be a good option. --Halavar 11:44, 10 February 2015 (UTC)  Done Thanks for your review, I've done a crop. Okay now? --Dnalor 01 11:54, 10 February 2015 (UTC)  Support Yes, now it's good. --Halavar 15:01, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elafonisos - Hauptort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elafonisos - Blick auf das Festland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Praktica LLC front view from above.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:48, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:55, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Praktica EE2 front view from above.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:06, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:56, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
scope.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:55, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 14:03, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fotokemika Efke, front view of a KB21 Black & white 135 film cartridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:24, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
 Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:16, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 14:04, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kodachrome, front view of a Kodachrome II 135 colour slide film cartridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:25, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
 Support A rare part today. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:14, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 14:05, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ilford Photo, front view of a PAN F Black & white 135 film cartridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:55, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:21, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 12:08, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomb of Saint Peter, picture showing the area of the lower floor of St. Peter's Basilica that lies above the site of St. Peter's tomb.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:57, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 12:11, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Catacomb of Callistus (Rome), detail of the Crypt of the Popes, seen from the main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:24, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 12:12, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
ORWO Orwochrom UT21, 135 film cartridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful --Hubertl 21:12, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose for the moment because of overly specific/to narrow scope. @Dnalor 01: can we agree on ORWO Orwochrom UT21, 135 film cartridge? --El Grafo (talk) 15:04, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Yes, El Grafo. --Dn@lor_01 (talk 15:27, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from ORWO Orwochrom UT21, front view of an ORWOChrom 135 colour slide film cartridge to ORWO Orwochrom UT21, 135 film cartridge --Dn@lor_01 (talk 15:27, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support now; pinging @Hubertl: because he also voted before scope change. --El Grafo (talk) 19:22, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mimosa Panchroma-Studio-Antihalo 9 x 12cm, boxing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:01, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose for the moment: @Dnalor 01: Can we please simplify the scope a bit? For instance, the image doesn't show plates in a box, all we can see is the box itself. I'd propose Mimosa Panchroma-Studio-Antihalo 9 x 12cm, boxing --El Grafo (talk) 15:10, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Ok, El Grafo. --Dn@lor_01 (talk 15:34, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Mimosa photographic plates, Mimosa Panchroma-Studio-Antihalo Panchromatic glass plates, 9 x 12cm, Mimosa A.-G. Dresden, Germany; in original boxing to Mimosa Panchroma-Studio-Antihalo 9 x 12cm, boxing --Dn@lor_01 (talk 15:34, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support now, thanks (ping @Jacek Halicki: hope you're OK with that as well?) --El Grafo (talk) 19:17, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:24, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Peugeot Elyséo 125 Roland Garros, 3/4 view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good image -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:20, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment yes indeed, however Peugeot Elyséo. 3/4 view should be enough and more appropriate for the scope IMO --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:00, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Thank you for your comment, you're right, I've corrected it that way. --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 20:10, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support ok, I added "125 Roland Garros" too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:13, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Thank you for your addition of "125 Roland Garros" and your review! --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 20:18, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kodacolor II 135-20, cartridge..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful, best picture in scope.--Hubertl 22:24, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
• temporary  Oppose: @Dnalor 01: there are lots of redundancies in the proposed scope, and there's no need to describe the subject in the scope. For instance, the scope for this VI is simply Extra 300, not something like Extra 300 aerobatic low wing single-engine propeller aircraft, as that's all already implied by the type of aircraft. There's also no need to add a "front view" for a main scope nomination, as that's the only side of the cartridge that's really of interest to anyone. (That's all with a big IMHO, of course.) I'd support in a heartbeat if we could agree on something like Kodacolor II 135-20, cartridge. for the scope. --El Grafo (talk) 08:42, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment: @El Grafo: Thank you for your review, I 100% agree with you and already have changed the scope the way you recommended it! --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 09:03, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Kodak color negative films, front view of a Kodacolor II 135-20 colour negative film cartridge to Kodacolor II 135-20, cartridge. --El Grafo (talk) 09:10, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

• Wow, that was quick!  Support now as promised. Pro-forma-pinging @Hubertl: as well. --El Grafo (talk) 09:10, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:44, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kodak Professional BW400CN 135 film, cartridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment See my comment on your other nomination: I'd prefer a more streamlined scope such as Kodak Professional BW400CN 135 film, cartridge. --El Grafo (talk) 08:53, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment: @El Grafo: Thank you for your comment, I 100% agree with you and already have changed the scope the way you recommended it! --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 09:08, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
• Thanks,  Support (all criteria met). --El Grafo (talk) 09:13, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leica D-Lux 6, front view from above.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:50, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:24, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leica D-Lux 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for a simple setting and f/18 --Hubertl 11:49, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

permission to use photo

Hello,

Canadian author Lillian Conti would like to include your photo, “File:Rom, Vatikan, Basilika St. Peter, Die Taube des Heiligen Geistes (Cathedra Petri, Bernini).jpg” in her forthcoming book. We’d like to request your written permission via email to do so. Please send permission to me at dario.cusmano@mail.mcgill.ca indicating how you would like credit to be given for the photo.

With thanks and best wishes, Dario Cusmano. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.58.217.115 (talk) 00:23, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Done: e-mail-answer! --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 18:03, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Rom,_Santa_Maria_in_Cosmedin,_Innenansicht_2

Dear Dnalor 01, I am a Prof. in Architectureand I am currently redacting a book titled “History of Interior Design and Furniture” and it will be published in Turkish edition. I would like to use your image from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Maria_in_Cosmedin#/media/File:Rom,_Santa_Maria_in_Cosmedin,_Innenansicht_2.jpg. At the end of the book, the name of the beholder of the image is noted in ‘Picture Credits.’ Best regards, Mustafa Demirkan mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com --hippofish 14:10, 11 July 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serhatakbak (talk • contribs) 14:10, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Done: I've sent an e-mail-answer to your adress! Best regards! --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 06:48, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rom, Santa Maria in Cosmedin, Reliquien des Hl. Valentin von Terni.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit small but no wonder for 12 years old picture. Good quality, please add English description next time and geocode if possible --Podzemnik 11:06, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steyr-Diesel Traktor Typ 80 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 09:43, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Double rainbow, Graz, Austria, 2020-04-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality to my eyes, but Dnalor_01, could you add geographic coordinates? Let me know. -- Ikan Kekek 02:38, 28 April 2020 (UTC)  Done Thank you for your request, I've added the geographic coordinates/camera position! ;-) --Dnalor_01 08:52, 28 April 2020 (UTC) Great!  Support - Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:52, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wien 13, Hietzing, Roter Berg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiener Stadttempel - Die Tafeln des Dekaloges 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:55, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puch Olympian 12 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:53, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Zum Guten Hirten, Wien-Hietzing 03 (März 2017).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 19:19, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christus als Guter Hirte, Pfarrkirche Zum Guten Hirten (Wien-Hietzing) 03 cropped.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Spurzem 21:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Figuraler gekreuzigter Jesus, Vortragekreuz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Added a few necessary categories --MB-one 13:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC) Thank you for your category additions! :) --Dnalor 01 09:17, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Graz-St. Peter 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:30, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
IMP 700 GT: Intermeccanica Puch IMP 700 GT Coupé (1961), seen at the Johann Puch Museum Graz (Austria).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support No good image but obviously a rare one, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 18:30, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 19:10, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Selection ramp Auschwitz II (Birkenau) looking towards trees, flowers of commemoration on the rail track.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Moving photo, very good; used and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 00:04, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Garage yard gate (KZ Mauthausen) memorial site, Entrance doorway, KZ Mauthausen memorial, Mauthausen, Upper Austria, Austria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:44, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jourhaus (KZ Mauthausen) memorial site, Main entrance building, KZ Mauthausen memorial, Mauthausen, Upper Austria, Austria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:54, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:44, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Roll call square (KZ Mauthausen) memorial site, Main concentration camp street and camp baracks, KZ Mauthausen memorial, Mauthausen, Upper Austria, Austria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Memory of perhaps the worst section of German history. Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 16:04, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 18:37, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Puch Olympian 12, Puch Olympian 12 men's bike, construction year 1985, Positron 12 gear shift.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 18:20, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Austrian Weather house, showing fine weather (the woman is outside the house).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Seems useful to me. Eliminated redundancy in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:48, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:51, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Margrave Leopold I of Styria, founder of Stift Rein (in red clothes).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 21:39, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Rupert, stained-glass window by Rudolf Szyszkowitz, Rupertikirche Hohenrain, Graz, Austria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. See again how I eliminated redundancies from the scope, and thanks for your fine nominations! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:51, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Depiction of the Christian Holy Spirit as a dove (Gian Lorenzo Bernini, c. 1660), stained glass in the apse of Saint Peter's Basilica, Rome, Vatican.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope, useful and very often used -- Spurzem (talk) 21:34, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Fotos in RegiowikiAT

Hallo Dnalor01, du brauchst in den Dateien nichts aktualisieren, das geschieht jeweils am Montag durch ein Bot, wobei die jeweilige alte Galerie überschrieben und aktualisiert wird. Somiot gibts alle Wochen eine aktuelle Liste, wenn du also im RegiowikiAT den eingebundenen Namen eines Fotos änderst, wird es hier automatisch nachgezogen. lg -- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 08:02, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Hallo K@rl, vielen Dank für deine Info! Das wusste ich trotz meiner langen Zugehörigkeit nicht! Wir lerne solange wir leben! Viele Grüße, Dn@lor_01 (talk) 18:34, 17 October 2022 (UTC)